The complementarian Council for
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) constantly boasts that their doctrine of female
subordination and male authority is different from the philosophy of “the world.” Although
how they can make that claim with a straight face is a marvel as their position
is identical to all religions, cultures, and societies in recorded history.
Complementarian bloggers are fond
of publishing, “I was a repentant feminist” type articles. Well, here is one
they could add to their portfolios but probably won’t. New Age Mormon author,
Betty Eadie, was a feminist … until she had a psychic—out of body—near death,
experience where she was astrally projected to the “other side” and, with the
help of her spirit guides, given understanding of all things.
Eadie’s book, Embraced by the Light (Bantam Books,
1992), is standard New Age fare with a Mormon twist. On the “other side,” she
met a “Jesus,” (the reader must understand that the Mormon Jesus is not the
Jesus of the Bible. Mormon teaching is that he is Lucifer’s brother) who
immediately put her mind at ease about all the different world religions. He
helped her understand that ALL religions and philosophies are “precious and
important.” In other words, there is no right or wrong religion, and, in the
end, everybody gets eternal life--regardless of what they believe.
During her out of body experience, she learned that Jesus is not
really God and did not create everything (Col 1:16-17; John 1:1-3). This New
Age/Mormon Jesus told her that God did not create the world by himself, as the
prophet declared in Isaiah 44:24, but rather that “all people, as spirits in
the pre-mortal world took part in the creation of the world.”
While on the “other side,” Her spirit guides
led her to a room where there was a Council of 12 men. She wrote of this
experience saying, “As a rather independent thinker on earth, I was sensitive
to the roles of women in the world. I was concerned about their equality…had
very strong opinions as to their ability to compete with men on an equal
footing in most settings. I might have reacted unfavorably to this council of
men and no women. But I was learning to have a new perspective about the
differing roles of men and women.”
Wow, this New Age/Mormon author,
through a demonic psychic experience, was brought into agreement with the CBMW
on the inferior status of women, both on earth and even into eternity. Eadie embraced,
what Jocelyn Andersen, in Woman this is WAR!, (One Way Press, 2010) called, the “Evil Woman” doctrine. Eadie wrote, “I
had seen the differences between Adam and Eve. I was shown that Adam was…satisfied
with his condition in the Garden and that Eve was more restless…I understood
the peril women faced from Satan…He would try to destroy families, and
therefore humanity, by tempting women…I began to see the difference in the
roles between men and women, and I understood the necessity and beauty of those
roles.”
Betty Eadie, through one
encounter with evil spirits, during an occult experience, became a repentant feminist
and, with no apparent coaching from the CBMW, immediately began to chant the complementarian mantras of differing “roles,”
and the “evil woman” doctrine that blames women for all of the woes of the
world and teaches that women must be kept on a short leash so they don’t bring ruin
upon everyone. She even threw in the smokescreen, complementarian, argument of “no
differences” between men and women. That argument makes no sense whatsoever as anyone
with eyes can see that there are differences!
What an amazing coincidence that
the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood are in complete agreement with a
doctrine of devils (the demonic manifestation of “Council of Men”) that helped
a confused Mormon woman to become a repentant feminist by helping her to understand
that the subordination of women is truly ordained by God for both time and
eternity.
What Is Betty Eadie Hiding?
http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0171a.html
I don't mean to be rude, but Betty Eadie doesn't sound very well balanced. And the really die-hard complementarians seem to be in the same boat.
ReplyDelete